Same unit-stub defect as the BOUNDARY tool fix: entity_boundary_source_on_plane
tessellated rays/XLINEs to a single base-point stub. Now takes clip bounds
derived from the full source map, sharing segments_bounds and
live_segments_for_curves instead of duplicating the logic.
Tests:
- xline_source_clips_to_given_bounds: clipped to the box, not the stub
Infinite construction lines tessellated to a single unit stub at the base
point, which can never close a face (and overwrote the real wire segments),
so XLINEs were silently ignored by BOUNDARY. Clip unbounded curves to the
finite extents via Liang-Barsky; lines missing the geometry contribute
nothing. Same shared helper fixes RAYs.
Tests:
- xline_splits_rectangle_into_two_faces: 10x10 rect split in two
- ray_splits_rectangle_into_two_faces: upward ray splits in two
- xline_missing_the_geometry_contributes_no_face: distant xline is a no-op
FILLET enumerated its own candidates twice, once for a line against an
arc and once for two arcs, each with its own quadratic, its own four
sign combinations and its own conventions about which root meant what.
Both are the same construction: a circle of the given radius tangent to
a curve has its centre on one of that curve's offsets, so the fillet
centre is where an offset of one crosses an offset of the other.
That now comes from the kernel, which does it for any pair of straight
and circular curves and agrees with the corner formula where both apply.
What stays here is the part that genuinely belongs to the command —
which candidate the two picks meant, whether the touch lands on the
drawn part of an arc rather than elsewhere on its circle, and which side
of each entity to keep.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
624 lines become 70. What went is the planar arrangement itself —
splitting segments at their crossings, welding coincident endpoints and
tracing the bounded faces of the resulting graph — which is not a
drawing-specific problem. It is the same one a B-rep boolean solves in a
face's parameter space once the intersection curves are projected into
it, so solving it in the kernel means the boolean does not arrive with a
second copy.
What stays is reading the wires, which is where the drawing's own
conventions are: NaNs separating the runs inside one WireModel, and the
double-single coordinate pair that has to be recombined before anything
is measured.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Karim Jerbi