material: report exact missing condition fields (#1334)
Material-card validation now names the exact condition fields missing for each property (missing_condition_fields), alongside the existing unspecified_conditions. Co-authored-by: 0xlillith <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
fd422a3fc1
commit
8b7fa2602e
4 files changed
+85
-6
No files matched your search
@@ -58,6 +58,16 @@ isotropic derived response and its reciprocals must also remain finite/positive.
|
||||
Moisture is kg water / kg dry material and can exceed one. It is not a wet-mass
|
||||
fraction. Unspecified temperature/state, wood moisture or polymer strain rate are
|
||||
reported in `unspecified_conditions`; they are not guessed or replaced by zero.
|
||||
The validation report also returns `missing_condition_fields`, a map from each
|
||||
incomplete property kind to its exact absent field names. Temperature and state
|
||||
apply to every family; wood additionally checks dry-basis moisture and polymers
|
||||
strain rate, following the same reporting policy as `unspecified_conditions`.
|
||||
For example, a wood density with temperature and state but no moisture reports
|
||||
`{"density":["moisture_dry_basis_kg_kg"]}`. Complete properties are omitted;
|
||||
an empty card returns an empty map, without inventing properties or conditions.
|
||||
This detail is read-only and does not change admission or the saved card schema.
|
||||
Older serialized validation reports without the map deserialize with an empty
|
||||
map; regenerate validation from the card to obtain the missing-field detail.
|
||||
The family label does not certify that a chosen constitutive model fits a material.
|
||||
Scalar strengths are individual measurements, not a three-dimensional failure
|
||||
envelope. Typed strength directions and test methods remain a separate extension.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user