bherbruckandClaude Opus 5.5
296683229d
* WIP deep rename (not for push) * WIP2 * WIP3 * WIP4 wxs fix * rustfmt * Rename the remaining identifiers in merged crash-report code Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RjGw4gA5ZvKrU8MQP6sBgT --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
1.2 KiB
name, about, title, labels, assignees
| name | about | title | labels | assignees |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bug report | Help reproduce and fix a SolidCraft problem |
Behavior
What did you expect, and what happened instead?
Reproduction
Include steps, SolidCraft version/commit and relevant environment details. Prefer a small example without private design data.
Screenshots of the behavior (when observable)
For observable CAD, UI or model behavior, include actual descriptive screenshots or a short recording from a small reproduction. This includes kernel, geometry, assembly and backend effects that can be shown in the app. Coding agents should run the app and capture the evidence themselves, rather than asking a human for evidence they can produce. Show the actual failure/result, preferably before and after, with brief steps, expected/actual behavior and annotations where helpful.
Flowcharts and Mermaid diagrams cannot substitute for evidence of visible behavior. Use diagrams for architectural reasoning when actual screenshots cannot illustrate the point. Changes with no useful observable behavior may omit screenshot/video evidence. Exclude private designs and sensitive details; attach media or link to an accessible recording rather than committing generated review artifacts.