Commit Graph
8 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
bherbruckandClaude Opus 5.5 1ff16cc72b A hole on a face drills into the material, also in older designs (#950) (#952)
* Hole matrix: placement, types, extents, edits and 0.9.0 designs, with today's failures listed

Each case checks the drill goes into the material, the bore sits on its axis, a blind hole stops
where it should, the removed volume against its analytic value, the face count and that every
body is still one closed valid solid. Failing cases are listed in tests/hole_matrix/known_failures.txt
as a ratchet.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>

* A hole on a face drills into the material, also in older designs (#950)

Without a direction, solid.hole took the direction from any face whose infinite plane passed
within ten tolerances of the point, the last one found winning: the far side of a thin plate or a
face of another body at the same height could set it, and the wrong direction was saved. It now
uses the face nearest the point, against its outward normal (exact for planes, cylinders and
spheres, so holes on curved faces work without a direction). When a design is evaluated, a face
hole whose saved direction leaves the face it starts on is mirrored into it, so designs saved
with the wrong direction drill into the part.

Fixes #950.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>

* Hole at a point on no face (a planar face's centroid outside it) keeps the plane it lies in

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>

* Record the hole direction fix in the goldens and the action matrix baseline (#950)

Seeds 7, 21, 81 and 85 drill their holes straight into their faces now. In the action matrix,
holes on four faces that used to go the wrong way now build, and two whose correct direction
meets a cut the kernel refuses are marked failing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>

* Goldens: seeds 7, 21 and 85 drill their holes straight in (#950)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
2026-10-14 01:45:11 -04:00
bherbruckandClaude Opus 5.5 00fdcf3e72 fix: grid lines for split ruling edges only in display and export meshes; record the moved seeds (#961)
#921's grid lines through the vertices that split a ruling edge also went into the meshes Boolean operations intersect, which changed seven robustness seeds (seed 2's sphere cut failed). Deflection::rulings now asks for them only in the kernel's own tessellation (display, export, measurement). The seeds #936 (rejected instead of unsupported), #946 (26 and 85 build, others fail differently) and #921's display side (about 1e-6) moved are recorded with their reasons.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
2026-10-14 00:14:18 -04:00
Lasse Lianandlasselian a2c7396160 Fillets and chamfers where edges meet at corners on a curved wall or a knife-edge tip (#851) (#935)
Rolling-ball blends now handle knife edges, where the two faces have opposite normals; an edge that runs out along an end face tangent to one side; and rounds that end in an earlier round on curved faces, picked together or one after another. The three edges at a vertex of smooth faces, rounded to one radius, end in a piece of sphere. When the given order of up to four edges is refused, or leaves a face boundary off its surface, other orders are tried.

Closes #851.

Co-authored-by: lasselian <[email protected]>
2026-10-13 23:21:47 -04:00
bherbruck 7498e3b367 The model's body mesh comes from the reference mesher again (#940)
Fixes 20 action-matrix regressions from #805 and the seed 14 shell refusal (#897).
2026-10-13 22:37:11 -04:00
bherbruckandClaude Opus 5.5 7c85970bfc Fillet and chamfer: refuse a smooth seam as having no corner to round (#936)
* Fillet and chamfer: refuse a smooth seam as having no corner to round

Picking the seams where R10 rounds run into the faces beside them, and asking for an R1
fillet there, failed with "not supported yet: blending a smooth edge (... both faces next
to the edge must be planar)". That reads like a missing feature, but the faces meet
tangentially at those edges and there is nothing to round.

An edge whose two faces are tangent along it is now refused as an invalid pick that names
the edge and asks for the sharp edges.

Fixes #896.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>

* Robustness goldens: seed 72's smooth-seam fillet is now a rejected pick, not unsupported

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
2026-10-13 21:02:06 -04:00
bherbruck 0040ce6bf2 Robustness goldens: record the seeds the 13 October kernel merges changed (#898)
Main has failed the full robustness goldens since #838, #839, #841, #855 and #856 landed together. Records the eleven seeds that now build differently (2, 6, 14, 22, 36, 43, 50, 63, 71, 73, 94), with a note. Shell now refusing seed 14, which used to build, is tracked in #897.
2026-10-13 18:46:00 -04:00
bherbruck 3d3f9b626f Robustness goldens: record seed 0 after the tessellation plans (#870)
#805 and the goldens (#826) landed side by side, so seed 0 was recorded before the new meshing reached main.
2026-10-13 17:30:16 -04:00
bherbruckandClaude Opus 5.5 534393ed5a test: seeded goldens for the robustness seeds (#826)
tests/robustness/goldens.json records what each of seeds 0-95 builds: its steps, how it ended (ok, or the kind and the start of the error it was refused with) and, for the design it left, the bodies' total volume and area (within a relative 1e-6) and their face, edge and shell counts. tests::robustness_goldens fails on any change; ROBUSTNESS_GOLDENS_BLESS="why" records one, with the reason and the seeds it moved. Pull requests that touch crates/kernel run every 8th seed; pushes to main and the nightly run every seed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
2026-10-13 16:23:27 -04:00