Revert the Abaqus comparison until its sources are confirmed public

Its values come from abaqus-docs.mit.edu, which returns 403 Forbidden outside MIT's network, so
they are not from a publicly accessible source. The section is kept aside for review.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UhhZMBTviDQxZvwnyP89fo
This commit is contained in:
jyvikoandClaude Opus 5.5 authored and Irakli Kourtis committed 2026-10-14 14:13:15 -04:00
1 parent ebf8c655ee
commit 94f7e8533a
2 files changed
+1 -37

No files matched your search

-2
View File
@@ -9,8 +9,6 @@ frozen so it cannot drift.
| Experiment | The model predicts reality | Measurements published in papers and reports (Taylor bar, cavity and cylinder flows, FSI experiments…) |
| Published benchmarks | Agreement with established codes on standard problems | NAFEMS benchmarks, vendor benchmark and verification manuals (e.g. Abaqus Benchmarks and Verification manuals), other published reference solutions |
How our results compare with the values Abaqus publishes for the same benchmarks: [README, How FieldCraft compares with Abaqus](../README.md#how-fieldcraft-compares-with-abaqus).
Rules:
- Each case is **our own model** of the problem, built from the published description (geometry,
material, loads, boundary conditions). We never run a commercial product and never copy its