1b-agent/OneCAD-Simulation
1
0 Fork 0
forked from 1b-agent/fieldcraft-upstream
Code Pull Requests Activity

docs: compare FieldCraft's benchmark results with Abaqus's published values

Browse Source 
A README section tabulates, per benchmark, the reference, the result the
Abaqus 2017 Benchmarks Guide publishes (element, mesh, error) and ours from
the oracle, with a cited source per value and notes where the rows are not
like for like. Linked from docs/verification.md.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UhhZMBTviDQxZvwnyP89fo
This commit is contained in:
jyvikoandClaude Opus 5.5 authored and Irakli Kourtis committed 2026-10-14 14:12:19 -04:00
1 parent 9f6afe7a89
commit ebf8c655ee
2 files changed
+37 -1
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

No files matched your search

docs/verification.md
+2
View File
@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ frozen so it cannot drift.
| Experiment | The model predicts reality | Measurements published in papers and reports (Taylor bar, cavity and cylinder flows, FSI experiments…) |
| Published benchmarks | Agreement with established codes on standard problems | NAFEMS benchmarks, vendor benchmark and verification manuals (e.g. Abaqus Benchmarks and Verification manuals), other published reference solutions |
How our results compare with the values Abaqus publishes for the same benchmarks: [README, How FieldCraft compares with Abaqus](../README.md#how-fieldcraft-compares-with-abaqus).
Rules:
- Each case is **our own model** of the problem, built from the published description (geometry,
material, loads, boundary conditions). We never run a commercial product and never copy its